|
Day 1
Nov 6, 2008 10:22:51 GMT -5
Post by skiddles on Nov 6, 2008 10:22:51 GMT -5
Wow. People sure have started out early spouting code phrases.
Think it's worth trying to slip one in that we know half of?
|
|
|
Day 1
Nov 6, 2008 12:07:45 GMT -5
Post by kuhlmeye on Nov 6, 2008 12:07:45 GMT -5
Well, doxa already put one in. And we've seen Mr.D and plut use them. We should try to figure ou what Mr.D was responding to.
|
|
|
Day 1
Nov 6, 2008 13:12:15 GMT -5
Post by rainfall on Nov 6, 2008 13:12:15 GMT -5
Should we accuse the 'mutants out of their cages' group? Belonging to a secret society is treason, is it not?
|
|
|
Day 1
Nov 6, 2008 13:12:52 GMT -5
Post by doxa on Nov 6, 2008 13:12:52 GMT -5
I have a list of people that are engaged in secret societies and that should be taken out for Friend Computer. I'm still collecting confirmation as of this moment. I'll get it out real soon
|
|
|
Day 1
Nov 6, 2008 14:50:06 GMT -5
Post by doxa on Nov 6, 2008 14:50:06 GMT -5
One group I've identified Arasaki Plutonium FreeAgent
Their call is the mutant and the cages, reply is corpses where they belong or some sort
There's another group I'm confirming
|
|
|
Day 1
Nov 6, 2008 15:04:10 GMT -5
Post by rainfall on Nov 6, 2008 15:04:10 GMT -5
Although it may be metagaming, which may or may not be punishable by friend computer, we could always check various sources of information on Alpha Complexes secret societies to determine which callsigns are clearly villainous, so as to avoid mistakenly accusing someone who could help the glorious cause of friend computer.
|
|
|
Day 1
Nov 6, 2008 15:05:01 GMT -5
Post by doxa on Nov 6, 2008 15:05:01 GMT -5
guys, we need to preserve Mundane Soul. He's my link into a larger group of mutants.
Please vote Warban
|
|
|
Day 1
Nov 6, 2008 15:54:15 GMT -5
Post by skiddles on Nov 6, 2008 15:54:15 GMT -5
I asked our illustrious Friend Computer a question- here it is with the answer:
-------------------------------------------- Clarification, Friend Computer.
Can an accusation be something as simple as "Posted text above his/her security clearance"? Or does it have to be secret society/action derived?
------------------------------------------- SECURITY CLEARANCES ARE NOT USED IN THIS EXPERIMENT. TREASON IS LIMITED TO SECRET SOCIETY MEMBERSHIP OR BEING AN UNDREGISTERED MUTANT.
|
|
|
Day 1
Nov 6, 2008 16:03:06 GMT -5
Post by IntSec Head Office on Nov 6, 2008 16:03:06 GMT -5
Secondary response:
When accusing membership to a secret society, you must provide the secret society. Likewise for mutant powers.
|
|
|
Day 1
Nov 6, 2008 16:18:40 GMT -5
Post by skiddles on Nov 6, 2008 16:18:40 GMT -5
A few more questions, since you're here, Mr. Head Office Citizen:
Is there a limit to how many we can accuse in one post? Do we have to wait for confirmation of one before accusing another?
Does the 10 CMT win condition involve us getting 10 traitors between all of us? or each? (please please not each)
|
|
|
Day 1
Nov 6, 2008 16:50:51 GMT -5
Post by IntSec Head Office on Nov 6, 2008 16:50:51 GMT -5
A few more questions, since you're here, Mr. Head Office Citizen: Is there a limit to how many we can accuse in one post? Do we have to wait for confirmation of one before accusing another?
Does the 10 CMT win condition involve us getting 10 traitors between all of us? or each? (please please not each)1. Each member may accuse one traitor per daycycle. Accusations are processed second in the order of actions. 2. 10 as a group. Please remember specifics when accusing, any missing or incorrect information will result in your termination. Also, accusations need to occur in the thread, in YELLOW
|
|
|
Day 1
Nov 6, 2008 16:55:54 GMT -5
Post by skiddles on Nov 6, 2008 16:55:54 GMT -5
Ugh. So if we accuse commies in the thread and not at vote close, then they get a chance to kill us off before the accusation hits them (since they go first in the order of actions)? And they'll know who we are the following day? So even if we get 10 valid names, we'll have to go through 3 nights of accusations before we win...assuming we suffer only minimal losses from non-communists through the first 2.
This is going to be a VERY difficult win condition to fulfill.
|
|
|
Day 1
Nov 6, 2008 21:31:27 GMT -5
Post by doxa on Nov 6, 2008 21:31:27 GMT -5
nuts, I don't know the name of their society... thats gonna be difficult. Next time we need to get one of them voted off or something.
|
|
|
Day 1
Nov 6, 2008 21:52:25 GMT -5
Post by doxa on Nov 6, 2008 21:52:25 GMT -5
Well warban revealed to being a seer. Thats a game changer
|
|
|
Day 1
Nov 6, 2008 22:08:28 GMT -5
Post by skiddles on Nov 6, 2008 22:08:28 GMT -5
I totally don't believe warban about being a seer. It's a really easy badguy copout- "I'm the seer, don't kill me!", and it ends up wasting a day's vote.
That said, I frequently am wrong about warban's playstyle, so maybe he is the seer and spent 9/10ths of the day calling votes onto himself for fun. Who knows?
|
|